Blog PostingsOccasional photographic excursions and observations.

Film Archives - SwitchingtoManual

Not uncool – Hipstamatic on the iPad Mini

Posted by | Australia, Black & White, Equipment, Film, Hipstamatic, ipad, iPad Mini, Landscape, Photography, Software | No Comments

I have a number of observations about a few different camera and film combinations coming up in the next week or two.

Let’s start at the high-tech end of the range with the faux low-tech Hipstamatic filters on the iPad Mini.   To borrow from Jane Austen, it’s a truth universally acknowledged that taking photos in public places with an iPad or other tablet device is very uncool.  I’ve been at remote mountain lookouts and been handed an iPad to take family snaps of strangers and I’ve turned around in the middle of a four hour hike in the Australian desert to see someone whip out a tablet to take a photo.  On both occasions I adopted a haughty air of superiority as I used whatever “real” camera I had with me to take the same photo.

Central Australia, panasonic DMC-GH2, LUMIX G VARIO 100-300/F4.0-5.6, 1/250sec @ f/5.6, ISO 160.

Central Australia, panasonic DMC-GH2, LUMIX G VARIO 100-300/F4.0-5.6, 1/250sec @ f/5.6, ISO 160.

But I regard the iPad Mini differently.  Firstly, it has a better camera than most big iPads, and is easier to handle for taking photos.  Secondly, I don’t own an iPhone or a new generation iPod Touch, so if I want to join the mobile photography revolution it’s either the iPad Mini, or my work provided Blackberry, which I don’t count because it reminds me of work.   So I’ve trotted out the iPad Mini on a few occasions recently, played with various photo apps and have landed on Hipstamatic as my current favourite.

I used to place Hipstamatic on the same low pedestal as Instagram, probably because of the predominately square image format and the fairly strong social networking angle of the product.  I can’t stand Instagram because it seems to have become a vehicle for peddling pure drivel and nothing to do with photography.  I  regard Hipstamatic far above Instagram, largely after I came across Hipstamatic’s genuinely interesting Snap! Magazine (reading it on the iPad Mini of course).  I fully acknowledge that its pithy, fast-paced styling is tailored for a generation with the concentration span of a house fly, but I like Snap’s strong photojournalistic content and styling.  It makes me want to live in San Francisco.

I’ve also come to accept the unashamedly fake photo styling produced by Hipstamatic’s endless combination of “lenses” and “film” types, because (a) I just have to get over being such a purist film snob, (b) it’s a nice change from the clean images I’m used to getting with my digital and film cameras, and (c) I think the effects are pretty decent imitations of traditional film processing techniques -  and for the most part, they look great.  These sentiments are far better expressed by Chris Knight in a great article on Fstoppers about Jenny Woods, a young photographer who seems to be solely interested in the image rather than the process.  Her work is a perfect defence against the argument that a particular “look” can only be called genuine photography if it’s produced using traditional darkroom techniques.  See more of Jenny’s stunning work on her website.

Anyway, on a recent holiday weekend in the Southern Highlands of New South Wales, I decided to put the iPad Mini and Hipstamatic, with a few of its less garish filters, through their paces.  My current favourite film types are C-Type and D-Type Plates.  Here’s a sample of the results, straight from the iPad Mini, using the Plate films and one or two others.  I’m looking forward to exploring more of this exciting form of photography.  I might even get an iPhone one day.

iPad Mini + Hipstamatic, Tinto 1884 lens, Kodot XGrizzled fim, no flash.

iPad Mini + Hipstamatic, Tinto 1884 lens, Kodot XGrizzled fim, no flash.

iPad Mini + Hipstamatic, Tinto 1884 lens, D-Type Plate fim, no flash.

iPad Mini + Hipstamatic, Tinto 1884 lens, D-Type Plate fim, no flash.

iPad Mini + Hipstamatic, Loftus lens, DC fim, no flash.

iPad Mini + Hipstamatic, Loftus lens, DC fim, no flash.

iPad Mini + Hipstamatic, Tinto 1884 lens, C-Type Plate fim, no flash.

iPad Mini + Hipstamatic, Tinto 1884 lens, C-Type Plate fim, no flash.

iPad Mini + Hipstamatic, Tinto 1884 lens, Kodot XGrizzled fim, Cherry Shine flash.

iPad Mini + Hipstamatic, Tinto 1884 lens, D-Type Plate fim, Cherry Shine flash.

iPad Mini + Hipstamatic, Tinto 1884 lens, Kodot XGrizzled fim, no flash.

iPad Mini + Hipstamatic, Tinto 1884 lens, Kodot XGrizzled fim, no flash.

iPad Mini + Hipstamatic, Tinto 1884 lens, D-Type Plate fim, no flash.

iPad Mini + Hipstamatic, Tinto 1884 lens, D-Type Plate fim, no flash.

Six dollar fun

Posted by | Film, Lomo, Lomo, Nik Software, Photography, Photoshop, Plastic cameras, Post-processing, Street photography | No Comments

Ever heard of the Nippon G-100?  Neither had I until I chanced upon a brand new one at the local markets and bargained the stall-holder down from $10 to $6.  Having tested the camera this past week, I think he got the better end of the deal.  However the enjoyment was all mine.

The Nippon G-100 is a “Made in China” 35mm plastic film camera which boasts a focus free 50mm f.6.3 lens.  There’s no way to adjust shutter speed, which I’ve estimated to be about 1/200th sec.  Not surprisingly, “focus free” means you can’t focus at all.  Add a centre viewfinder, a shutter button and the film wind-on/rewind facilities, and that’s it.  Oh, it has a flash hot-shoe on top which I haven’t tested.  So how’d it perform?

Nippon G-100

As you can see, I had some trouble – but it was the wonderful, magical, whimsical type of trouble you get when you spend $6 on a plastic camera.  The lab which developed and scanned the roll of Fuji film (400ASA) only charged me $10 because light leakage had “ruined” several images, and something strange had occurred with the wind-on of the film, which resulted in a few overlapping frames.  So I was down sixteen bucks plus a roll of film. Add to that a bit of time in front of the iMac rescanning the negatives, playing with the Levels and Hue/Saturation adjustments and noise reduction in Photoshop, and adding borders with Nik’s Colour Efex Pro 4 and I have some images which will hopefully make the Chinese designers of the Nippon G-100 smile.

These show before and after the rescanning and processing described above. The initial scanning was done at the lab.  Of course post-processing is a subjective thing so they could have been handled differently, with different outcomes.  But I did only spend $6 on the camera!

Nippon G-100 – out of the camera

Nippon G-100 – after reprocessing

Nippon G-100 – out of the camera

Nippon G-100 – after reprocessing

Nippon G-100 – out of the camera

Nippon G-100 – after reprocessing

The Tiwi’s hope

Posted by | Australia, Black & White, Film, Olympus, Olympus OM2n, Photography, Tiwi Islands, Travel | One Comment

Over the last year I’ve had the great good fortune to travel to the far north of Australia to Melville Island, one of the remote Tiwi Islands.  The Tiwi Islands have a unique place in Australia’s modern history and in its cultural diversity, having an indigenous population which has managed to hold out against many of the deprivations of the mainland Aboriginal people.  However the Tiwis are not without their problems, with unemployment and youth suicide both at an unacceptably high rate.  However there is hope for the Tiwis in the form of the Tiwi College, which is a school run by the Tiwis, for the Tiwi youth.  Its attendance rates average about 90%, which is significantly higher than the average for most indigenous schools around Australia.

Olympus OM2n, Zuiko 50mm f1.4

Through projects such as building a sustainable gardens to learning about carbon initiatives and forestry, there’s real hope for the future of the kids who attend the college.  More importantly, the Tiwi College provides these kids with a safe, stable and consistent learning environment, which gives them a genuine chance to break away from the cycle of unemployment, abuse and despair which has held Australia’s indigenous people back for so many generations.  What’s more, they’re fantastic kids.  Here are a few of them, courtesy of my old Olympus OM2n and a 50mm f.1.4 lens.  I’ll provide more observations about the Tiwi Islands in later posts.

Olympus OM2n, Zuiko 50mm f1.4

Olympus OM2n, Zuiko 50mm f1.4

Kids playing with my camera. Olympus OM2n, Zuiko 50mm f1.4

Olympus OM2n, Zuiko 50mm f1.4

Olympus OM2n, Zuiko 50mm f1.4

Circular Quay, Sydney

Olympus Trip to Manly

Posted by | Apple Aperture, Film, Olympus, Olympus Trip 35, Photography, Seascapes, Sydney | No Comments

Last week I described a day out I had with an old Olympus Trip 35 which had a broken light meter.  I had such fun with that camera and enjoyed the experience of shooting manually with film so much, that I bought another Olympus Trip 35 for $20 on eBay, this time with a working meter.

Nikon D300s, AF Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D, 6secs @ f.22, ISO 800

I had to take an early morning ferry ride across Sydney Harbour to Manly during the week, so I took a couple of rolls of cheap Fujifilm Superia X-tra 400 colour film and the new camera to see how it performed.

Olympus Trip 35, Fujifilm Superia X-tra 400 ASA film

In any weather Sydney Harbour provides countless photographic opportunities.  The Sydney Opera House and the spectacular Harbour Bridge sit in the centre of a working harbour, with cruise ships, old fashioned ferries, and numerous other working vessels set against against beautiful scenery.  The 40mm lens on the Trip is ideal for capturing the wide vistas encountered on the 30 minute ferry ride from Circular Quay to Manly.

Olympus Trip 35, Fujifilm Superia X-tra 400 ASA film

A ride to Sydney’s northern suburb of Manly on the famous ferry is an essential experience for any visitor to Australia.  Locals should also take the trip more often to remind themselves what an amazingly beautiful city they live in.  The Manly ferries are large vessels which can carry over a 1000 people, mostly city commuters and tourists.  They have a few decks and plenty of space outside to take in the view and breath in the (fairly) fresh sea air.  Fortunately for the early morning journey out of the city, I was travelling against the torrent of commuters, so the ferry was nearly empty.

Olympus Trip 35, Fujifilm Superia X-tra 400 ASA film

Olympus Trip 35, Fujifilm Superia X-tra 400 ASA film

Manly is a seaside village with plenty of cafes, restaurants and a long, sandy beach known for its great surfing.  There is a particular Manly culture which is appreciated only by locals, so I won’t attempt to describe it further.  By the time I arrived the sun was high, so I knew that anything I photographed would be affected by harsh contrast.  Of course, without a rear LCD screen or histogram on the camera you’re working on instinct and a large dose of luck.  With the camera set on Auto I really just had to compose, zone focus, and shoot.

Olympus Trip 35, Fujifilm Superia X-tra 400 ASA film, cropped vertical

Olympus Trip 35, Fujifilm Superia X-tra 400 ASA film

A few days later I collected the negatives and a CD with the scanned picture files.  Some of the images were badly affected by lens flare, and others were way out of focus, but on the whole I was happily surprised with the colours and relative crispness of the images.  I applied some cropping and a little sharpness in Aperture but that was about it.  My next assignment is to try a couple of rolls of slower film, but for that I might choose a different camera from my small collection of classics.

Olympus Trip 35, Fujifilm Superia X-tra 400 ASA film

A very manual experience – the Olympus Trip 35

Posted by | Apple Aperture, Black & White, Education, Equipment, Film, Manual exposure, Olympus, Olympus Trip 35, Photography, Street photography | 2 Comments

A few months ago I spent about $10 at my local thieves market on an Olympus Trip 35, thinking it would make a nice bookshelf ornament.  It did – until I stared this whole “switching to manual” blogging thing, which has made me think more about the challenges of manual photography.  So I bought a roll of Kodak BW400CN film, loaded the camera and shot 24 frames in my lunch hour last week.

Olympus Trip 35, 1/40th sec @ f.11 or f.16, ASA 400, Kodak BW400CN film

There are plenty of web sites and blogs devoted to the little Olympus Trip 35, and  several Flickr groups containing vigorous discussions about all aspects of the camera, but there’s actually not a lot to say.  They were manufactured between 1968 and 1984, with little variation in the classic design and sturdy build quality.  Mine has a chrome shutter button, which apparently means it was made before they changed to black shutter buttons in the mid-1970s.   The serial number is 1494120 in case anyone’s counting.

The camera has two shutter speeds, 1/200th sec and 1/40th sec.  It has aperture control (f.2.8 – f.22), which is designed to be used with flash only, at 1/40th sec.  At all other times the camera is supposed to be used in auto mode, with the only manual inputs being film speed (ASA 25 – 400) and zone focussing.  You focus by selecting one of four symbols on the lens dial: a single person, two people, a group, or a mountain range.  There’s also a distance scale under the lens, in both feet and meters.  Oh, and the light meter is comprised of a selenium cell around the lens, which locks the camera to prevent underexposed images.

Olympus Trip 35, 1/40th sec @ f.11 or f.16, ASA 400, Kodak BW400CN film

So I thought I was pretty special when I loaded my roll of film and wound it to the first frame.  That was until I found that the light meter in my little Trip was broken, so the camera simply locked-up in auto mode (a little red flag pops up in the viewfinder).  At first I considered removing the film and trying the same exercise in my Olympus OM2n on another occasion, but that would have left me with nothing to do for the rest of lunch, so I thought “what would someone who writes a blog called ‘Switching to Manual’ do”?  I switched to manual.

So my parameters were as follows: harsh lunch-time light, a fixed 1/40th sec shutter speed, ASA 400 speed film and an adjustable aperture range from f.2.8 to f.22, which was supposed to only be used with a flash.  I had no flash, by the way.  Thinking digitally, I also had no auto-focus, no LCD screen to review the images, no histogram, and no 16Gb memory card to take 1000 images if I chose.

Olympus Trip 35, 1/40th sec @ f.11 or f.16, ASA 400, Kodak BW400CN film

The conundrum wasn’t hard to solve.  I varied the aperture between f.11, f.16 and f.22 to cope with the fast film speed, selected the focus zones as well as a first time user could hope to do, propped the camera on some sort of support as much as possible to deal with the low shutter speed, and fired away – fully expecting to be shooting 24 blanks.

Olympus Trip 35, 1/40th sec @ f.11 or f.16, ASA 400, Kodak BW400CN film

The results are shown in this post (ignoring the majority of rejects of course) .  For me, with a broken light meter and a fixed 1/40th sec shutter speed, anything more manual than this would be a pin-hole camera, so I was pretty amazed with the results.  The only adjustments I’ve made to these images is cropping and straightening, a slight contrast boost and adding the black border – all in Aperture 3.  Obviously they’re just basic photo-kiosk standard scans from the negatives, so it’s possible the jpeg files could have been better quality if I’d gone to a professional lab.  That’s why I allowed myself the luxury of a little boost in contrast.  I also removed a few specks of dust from one of the images.

Before wrapping up, let me share some interesting insights into what this experience has taught me about the impact of the digital age on my photography, remembering that I shot with film SLRs for many years.  First, looking at the back of the camera after each shot is now ingrained into my shooting practice. I’m by no means a serial-LCD viewer, and in fact I’ve pretty much turned off the LCD screen on my Panasonic GH2, but looking at the back of the camera has become a security blanket, both to check on an uncertain capture and to break eye contact with the person I just took a sneaky photo of.  I caught myself looking at the back of the Olympus Trip 35 after each shot. Thankfully, it just looked back at me.

I also found I was a lot less concerned about framing the subject in the viewfinder, and instead was willing to be as casual about the framing as I would be if  I had an endless number of images to shoot.  That confidence helped a lot given that the camera was on the ground for a lot of the shots to cope with the low shutter speed.  I didn’t feel any guilt about cropping and straightening in software, figuring that it was really no different to what I would have done to the same image in a darkroom.

Finally, and most importantly, shooting with a 40 year old Olympus Trip 35 gave me the same pleasure that shooting with my Nikon D300s gives me, so the passion burns just as brightly without a light meter.   In fact I’ve just bought another Olympus Trip 35 off eBay (for $20 this time), and the seller assures me it works beautifully.  I’ll let you know once I’ve tried it.

Olympus Trip 35, 1/40th sec @ f.11 or f.16, ASA 400, Kodak BW400CN film